Spacecraft designs can be categorised according to their stabilisation method as either spin
stabilised or inertially stabilised. Spin stabilised spacecraft utilise the increased
moment of inertia of a spinning body to aid stabilisation. Less common today than in the designs of
the 1970s and ‘80s, spin stabilised spacecraft include some geostationary weather satellites and a
class of large communications satellites (the Hughes 600 series)., The design is losing
favour as it is often reliant on a mechanically de-spun platform on which earth-pointing antennae
and instruments are mounted—failure of which causes the total loss of the spacecraft.
Inertially stabilised spacecraft are controlled similarly in all axes to hold a fixed rotational
orientation in space. Increasingly the most common stabilisation method for spacecraft of 500 kg
or more, inertially stabilised spacecraft provide a stable platform from which to make sensitive
measurements. The spacecraft may still be spun-up for particular mission phases (such as release
from the launcher or orbit injection burns), but for the operational phases of the mission, they are
de-spun and acquire an inertial lock. The stability performance of the spacecraft is dependent on
the type of control system and the sensors and actuators employed. Most fully stabilised spacecraft
are controlled using heavy spinning gyroscopes or reaction wheels (discussed further in the
attitude determination section). This description will focus on this latter type of spacecraft as
they represent the more common and most technologically advanced.
The design and construction of all but the smallest spacecraft is invariably broken down by the
functional tasks that must be performed. A system level division is followed, both to simplify
construction of an extremely complex device, and to allow a multi-national participation in the
design and manufacturing task, with different companies or consortia undertaking responsibility for
different systems. The body of the spacecraft, or bus, is considered distinct from the
experiments or instruments that it carries, termed the payload. It is also known as the service
module, as it provides services such as power, communications and a stable observation platform
to the payload. The following sections discuss the tasks that the spacecraft bus performs.
The structure of the spacecraft must support instruments and propellant tanks and accommodate
other spacecraft systems over the life-cycle of the spacecraft. It must be strong enough to survive
the high gravity, wide-band vibration of launch, interfacing securely with the launcher, yet still
be light enough to conserve spacecraft mass. Traditionally, combinations of aluminium alloy
honeycomb, carbon fibre and titanium are used to produce a stiff spacecraft skeleton. Figure 1 below
shows an exploded view of a typical structure.
Figure 1: A Eurostar Spacecraft Bus (Telecom 2).
Power is a crucial commodity aboard spacecraft. All systems are designed to minimise power
consumption, often having quiescent, standby modes activated when a particular system is not in use.
Power generation is usually by large solar arrays, deployed on either side of the spacecraft soon
after launch (Figure 2) and oriented to face the sun, either solely by maneuvering the spacecraft in
the case of fixed arrays, or in combination with an array drive motor, rotating the arrays to
maximise the sun’s incidence angle. Batteries are used to meet extra demand during intensive
periods (measurement taking etc.), or if the spacecraft is eclipsed by another orbital body, and are
carefully cycled to prolong life.
Figure 2: Rosetta (Artists Impression with Solar Arrays Extended).
The spacecraft must also maintain a reasonable thermal environment for the operation of
instruments and systems. A network of heaters (usually included in each system), heat transfer
pipes, and radiators dissipate surplus heat to space. Silvered Kapton heat shielding protects
sun-facing equipment. The cooling system is usually passive (except for sensitive detectors).
Heaters with temperature sensors control the local environment at strategic points around the
spacecraft, ensuring that electronics and mechanics are maintained typically between 0Ý
C and 40Ý C.
Critical to any spacecraft, the communication and data handling system relays instrument and
housekeeping data back to ground station and receives commands and instructions in return. On board
the spacecraft a computer with an extended communications bus collects and distributes system
information between system modules including the communications module. The particular design of the
housekeeping computer employed is usually spacecraft dependent and closely linked with the
design of the communications system. There is also usually a separate dedicated system passing
sensor information and commands between modules of the Attitude Control system. Within Europe, the
design of this system has evolved towards an industry standard known as MACS.
For deep space missions, high pointing accuracy is integral to reliable communication. Ground
station antennae are often high power, broadcasting thousands of watts, but still require a good fix
on the spacecraft location to communicate commands successfully. Return communication is even harder
to achieve. Spacecraft antennae broadcast only a few watts, often focused in a tight beam pattern to
maximise receiving power. They must be carefully directed at the earth to establish communication.
Wobbles in the spacecraft’s stability (as happened in the Giotto mission during approach to
Halley’s comet) upset reception.
Figure 3: The Hubble Space Telescope Communicating via TDRS.
Some missions utilise inter-spacecraft communication systems. Both Hubble Space Telescope and
Shuttle missions return data to earth via a TDRS satellite in a higher orbit, more often in contact
with particular ground stations (Figure 4), providing communications links over at least 80% of all
low earth orbits. There have also been experiments with high data-rate inter-satellite
communications by laser, although such a system is still experimental. With both transmitter and
receiver limited in size and power, pointing accuracy must be even more precise (equivalent to a two
sigma pointing accuracy of 0.03 arcsec).
Most spacecraft designs include a liquid propulsion system of either mono-propellant type
(usually mono-methyl hydrazine, ignited by catalyst) or bi-propellant (a fuel, usually hydrazine,
and an oxidiser that combust when mixed). A network of smaller thrusters are used to apply fine
adjustment impulses and are distributed about the spacecraft to allow all combinations of forces and
torques to be applied to any face or about any axis. A larger single axis thruster is included to
allow gross changes in spacecraft translational position.
The system has two functions: first, to raise or change the spacecraft orbit; and second, to
unload the spinning reaction wheels used for rotational control (discussed in the next section). The
fuel is often a significant portion of the spacecraft’s overall mass (up to 60% in current designs
such as the Cluster spacecraft). In a spacecraft with no significant system failures, the quantity
of fuel remaining often determines the length of a spacecraft’s operational life. After all the
fuel is exhausted, reaction wheels finally saturate and attitude may no longer be maintained.
The storage and distribution of this fuel has significant implications for other spacecraft
systems. Systems are complex and involve an extensive network of pipes and valves to ensure
redundancy in the event of valve failure. The structure of the spacecraft must be capable of
supporting large fuel tanks during launch. Most fuels and oxidisers are highly corrosive and
explosive causing particular problems when fuelling the spacecraft prior to launch. After launch, a
significant portion of the total fuel volume is often expelled to adjust the spacecraft’s
translational location, placing it in its operational orbit or trajectory. Significant depletion of
fuel tanks allows the fuel movement, sloshing around in the tanks—a major, unpredictable
disturbance to the spacecraft. Tanks often include diaphragms or baffles to try to minimise the
effect. When the fuel is burnt, and evacuated to space, the exhaust plumes must be directed away
from sensitive instruments and optics to minimise interference or damage. Systems must be carefully
designed to account for all these factors.
An attitude stabilisation system for an inertially stabilised spacecraft maintains the
spacecraft’s constant orientation in space, directing communication antennae at the earth,
training power-generating solar arrays on the sun, and pointing scientific cameras and instruments
at objects under investigation. Determination of the current attitude is carried out by banks of
sensors that sense relative orientation with respect to other bodies including the sun, earth, stars
and other planets. Rate and acceleration sensors are also employed to sense motion. The attitude
determination task is discussed further in the next section.
Control and adjustment of attitude is by a network of actuators. Gross changes in attitude are
brought about by the propulsion system—firing thrusters, burning propellant to provide impulse.
Such coarse adjustments are rarely employed during normal operation because they use fuel, inject
vibrations into the structure, and produce an imprecise impulse. Fine attitude control is invariably
produced by reaction wheels—heavy spinning gyroscopes—grouped in packs of four to control all
three axes, with a fourth spare wheel mounted skew to the others should any wheel fail. Torque
impulses are produced by electric motors that increase or retard the rotation rate. Control is
extremely accurate and produces low levels of unwanted vibration (due to imbalances, bearing and
cage rumble and motor ripple). Recently, magnetic bearings have been developed to minimise this
further.
Occasionally, a reaction wheel may saturate—reach its maximum or minimum spin rate—and the
spin rate of the wheel must be brought back to an acceptable level to maintain effective control.
The process, called wheel off-loading, adjusts spin rate by injecting impulses from another
actuator and compensating for them. Earth orbiting spacecraft often employ magnetorquers—electro-magnetic
coil devices that produce an impulse in the earth’s magnetic field. Other spacecraft fire small
thrusters, using valuable propellant to counter wheel saturation.
Spacecraft also utilise a variety of other actuators to attain small control impulses. Solar
sailing is common—adjusting the spacecraft’s profile in the sun to produce small torques or
thrusts due to the action of solar radiation pressure. Ion thrusters, cold gas thrusters and other
devices that conserve valuable propellant are also used. For earth orbiting satellites, approximate
attitude stabilisation is often attained using static booms with masses that exploit gravity
gradient effects.
Next: Spacecraft Attitude
Determination Systems
References
| Wertz J. R., Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, pp 3, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 1978, ISBN 90-277-12042.
| Cope P., "Guidance and Control of
Meteosat, Second Generation", in Proceedings of
the 2nd International Conference on GNC, ESA WPP—071, April 1994,
Noordwijk, The
Netherlands.
| Wilson A., "Intelsat 6", Jane’s Space Directory, 11th Edition, Jane’s
Information Group Ltd, pp 316, 1995, ISBN 0-7106-12591.
| Turner R. F., "Spacecraft Structures", Spacecraft Systems Engineering, ed. P.
Fortescue and J. Stark, John Wiley, 1991, ISBN 0-471-927945.
| Quine B. M. and Taylor E., Assessment of a Eurostar Derived Spacecraft for OMI, Ch. 7,
British Aerospace Space Systems Ltd, TP 9254, December 1989.
| Satcom International, The Eurostar Class Spacecraft, 1989,
Cedex, France.
| Calder N., Giotto to the Comets, pp 113, Presswork, 1992, UK, ISBN 0-952011506.
| Wilson A., Jane’s Space Directory, 11th Edition, Jane’s Information Group Ltd, pp 360,
1995, ISBN 0-7106-12591.
| Mathur R. P. and Purll D. J., "Tracking Sensor Developments for Optical Inter-satellite
Links", in Proceedings SPIE Aerosense Symposium, pp88-96, Vol. 1131, 1989, Paris,
France.
| Southampton University. Spacecraft Technology Course Notes, Southampton University, 1985.
| Parker D. H. and Pope J., "Design and Verification of the Propulsion System of the Cluster
Scientific Spacecraft", in Proceedings International Astronautics Federation, S1453,
1993, Graz, Austria.
| Quine B. M., Propellant Fuel Slosh in Spherical Tanks: A Practical Investigation, TP 9286,
British Aerospace Space Systems Ltd, March 1990, Filton, Bristol.
| Wood T. D., The Study of Very High Pointing Accuracy Attitude and Orbital Control Systems,
British Aerospace Space Systems, TP 9510 / ESA A0/1-2683/93/NL/JG, 1993, UK
| Bichler U. J., "A Magnetic Bearing Momentum Wheel as Very Low Noise 6-DOF Spacecraft
Actuator", in Proceedings 1st ESA International Symposium on Space Micro-dynamics and
Accurate Control, December 1992, Nice, France. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |