Web 2.0
Here’s a lovely little piece on Web 2.0. definitely not coming from the “naïve realist” camp…
Course Site for Future Cinema 1 (and sometimes Future Cinema 2: Applied Theory) at York University, Canada
Here’s a lovely little piece on Web 2.0. definitely not coming from the “naïve realist” camp…
Wed, February 7 2007 » Future Cinema, Web 2.0
This course examines the shift from traditional cinematic spectacle to works probing the frontiers of interactive, performative, and networked media. Drawing upon a broad range of scholarship, including film theory, communication studies, cultural studies and new media theory, the course will consider how digital technologies are transforming the semiotic fabric of contemporary visual culture. Our focus will be on the phenomenon Gene Youngblood described three decades ago as expanded cinema an explosion of the frame outward towards immersive, interactive and interconnected (i.e., environmental) forms of culture.
Wordpress / SH / Feed / Comments Feed
Though I find it gets overly dramatic at the end with the “family” “love”, etc.
I saw this on youtube a few days ago, and I was interested in this video’s producer more than the actual content. I was interested by his research lab’s term “digital ethnography”.
I never thought of it that way — I know people are doing ethnographic studies online, and I find them fascinating, but it’s interesting to think about it as an entirely new sub-discipline that needs a different approach, perspective, methodology, ethical considerations, etc.
Definitely a research area that will probably grow significantly.
Also, what I find interesting about research on the internet (rather, about the internet, emersive technologies) is that they truly require the academic to also be a practitioner (at least to some degree).
It would be incredibly difficult to bring insight into the world of the internet, or mobile technology, without using it, or communicating with other users (and this communication would have to come through the medium).
I can go on for hours about the implications of digital ethnography.
Anyone else have any comments/thoughts?