Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective (2nd edition)

Errata
Errata for the 2nd edition are posted here. If you spot any errors in the book, please let me know and I'll post a correction.
Thanks,
Scott MacKenzie (mack@yorku.ca)

Page Location Error / Correction
4 1st full paragraph Should begin, "Aside from the reference to square-rigged ships."
Thanks to Jiho Kim for pointing out the typo.

27 Figure 1.16 2013 | SUI | Spatial User Interfaces → 2013 | SUI | Spatial User Interaction
Thanks to Rob Teather for pointing out the typo.

34 4th line Should read, "it is the interface …"
64 Figure 2.30 Oops! The spacing in this figure is wrong. Here's how the figure should appear:

98 Section 3.1.3.3, 2nd last line in 1st paragraph Should read, "Potter and colleagues chose …"

115 3rd line Should read, "along the y-axis …"

146 1st line Should read, "It is easy to imagine applications …"

179 1st paragraph in section 4.4.2.1, 8th line Should read, "… but little else."

209 Figure 5.2 With 3 independent variables, the number of 2-way interaction effects is 3 (not 2):

312 3rd line The first equation should include subtraction (not addition) and with the result rounded as shown here:

23.1 - (1.96 × 3.39) = 16.5 wpm

417 Reference [392] The year of publication for the Penfield and Rasmussen reference is 1950 (not 1990).

Page	Location	Error / Correction
4	1st full paragraph	Should begin, "Aside from the reference to square-rigged ships." Thanks to Jiho Kim for pointing out the typo.
27	Figure 1.16	2013 \| SUI \| Spatial User Interfaces → 2013 \| SUI \| Spatial User Interaction Thanks to Rob Teather for pointing out the typo.
34	4th line	Should read, "it is the interface …"
64	Figure 2.30	Oops! The spacing in this figure is wrong. Here's how the figure should appear:
98	Section 3.1.3.3, 2nd last line in 1st paragraph	Should read, "Potter and colleagues chose …"
115	3rd line	Should read, "along the y-axis …"
146	1st line	Should read, "It is easy to imagine applications …"
179	1st paragraph in section 4.4.2.1, 8th line	Should read, "… but little else."
209	Figure 5.2	With 3 independent variables, the number of 2-way interaction effects is 3 (not 2):
312	3rd line	The first equation should include subtraction (not addition) and with the result rounded as shown here: 23.1 - (1.96 × 3.39) = 16.5 wpm
417	Reference [392]	The year of publication for the Penfield and Rasmussen reference is 1950 (not 1990).