In Search of A U.S. Policy Toward Canada: Imperial Hegemon, Benevolent Neighbour Or Neither? York U. Prof. Co-Authors New Book, Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies Toward Canada
In Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies Toward Canada, published by UBC Press, the authors examine White House policy from 1945 to the 1980s, debunking both the prevailing Canadian view that the U.S. has treated us as a dependent, and the notion that Washington has respected Canadian advice on foreign policy issues or benefitted from it.
"When Canadians think or speak of the United States, they tend to think in terms of stereotypes: America the imperial hegemon or America the benevolent liberal neighbour," said Mahant, who teaches at York University's Glendon College. "In this book, we try to find the truth behind these images."
To do that, the authors visited presidential archives across the U.S. -- examining recently de-classified documents -- and interviewed key American policy makers such as Dean Rusk, former Secretary of State under President Johnson, and Walt Rostow, Johnson's National Security Advisor. They conclude that Washington's interest in, and attention to, relations with Canada has declined progressively since the end of World War II. Instead of a ëCanada Policy,' Washington produced a series of policies arising in an ad hoc manner in answer to specific trade and foreign policy issues.
Mahant writes that Canada played a liberal internationalist role only during the first 10 years after the Second World War, a role that reached its zenith during the 1956 Middle East crisis when Prime Minister Lester Pearson's mediatory efforts won him the Nobel Peace Prize.
"Since then, there are relatively few examples of the Americans accepting a liberal internationalist role for Canada in their relations, apart from Canada's peacekeeping role in Cyprus in 1964, and in southern Africa toward the end of the Cold War." The authors say a frequent phenomenon in U.S.-Canadian relations is that Canadians think they can give advice and moderate American policy, but the Americans will have none of it.
"President Franklin Delano Roosevelt may have valued Prime Minister Mackenzie King's advice, but post-war presidents had little use for Canadian advice. Presidents Johnson and Nixon did not want Prime Minister Pearson's counsel on Vietnam; Prime Minister Trudeau's peace initiative only annoyed the Reagan White House; and Prime Minister Mulroney could not persuade his friend Reagan to take a stronger stand against South Africa's apartheid policies," the authors conclude.
Overall, Washington's treatment of Canada was issue by issue more often than it was part of a more general U.S. foreign policy objective. Yet there were exceptions. Says Mahant: "While the influence of major U.S. firms helped to create the Autopact and to undo attempts at national - much less continental - energy policies on both sides of the border, wider political purposes prevailed at other times. The creation of NAFTA or NATO or the 1971 elimination of the gold standard are examples of American policies inspired by larger political goals."
Among the book's findings:
Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies Toward Canada is available in bookstores for $45. The State University of Michigan Press plans to publish a paperback version early in the year 2000.
For more information, please contact:
Dr. Edelgard Mahant
Susan Bigelow |
| Welcome to York University | Latest Release | Release Archives | |