Skip to main content Skip to local navigation
Home » Collaborative Fat 'Becomings': An Interview with Ramanpreet Annie Bahra and Kelsey Ioannoni

Collaborative Fat 'Becomings': An Interview with Ramanpreet Annie Bahra and Kelsey Ioannoni

Interview by Mackenzie Edwards



You two are founders and co-journal managers of Excessive Bodies: A Journal of Artistic and Critical Fat Praxis and Worldmaking, which I also help edit and do social media for. Can you shed some light on the genesis of the Excessive Bodies and how you envision it “thickening" the world of fat studies publishing?

Kelsey Ioannoni: Excessive Bodies actually started with a group who, for the most part, are no longer actively working on the journal. A few senior scholars in the field of fat studies put out a call in our networks to see if we could collectively envision a new space for both academic and creative content in fat studies. It took some time networking, building a collective, and measuring capacity, but ultimately we developed a core group of fat studies scholars who have become our editorial collective. 

One of the really cool ways we are thickening fat studies publishing is through mentorship; one of our major goals with a new space for fat studies scholarship is to help break down the barriers to publishing that many new and early career scholars face when trying to get their work out there. Our collective actively works with our authors and contributors to strengthen their work and to support them throughout the process. 

Ramanpreet Annie Bahra: It was May 2022, and in my inbox, I saw an email forwarded by Kelsey about a network that aimed to advance the field of fat studies through some medium. In a time when many of us felt isolated due to the ongoing pandemic and neoliberal standards within academia, we connected to cultivate a nurturing pedagogical practice and space for alternative expressions. Following our initial meeting, we continually reflected on how we can centre the tenets of intersectionality, knowledge mobilization, and solidarity in our organizing practices.

I remember writing in the meeting minutes that we envisioned EB as a journal “made by us, for us”—sparking our subversion of publishing pedagogies. Additionally, these ongoing conversations sought to build something accessible for those interested in fat politics and liberation. This led to structuring the journal as open access to remove barriers typically present in publishing and accessing literature, marking our second act of collective access in the world of fat scholarship. From 2022 to the present, many initial participants have had to recuse themselves to prioritize their capacities, but they continue to contribute to Excessive Bodies through various roles (copyeditors, senior advisory board members, peer reviewers, etc.). Despite changes, our editorial collective of eight members (including both of us) has witnessed joyful growth within the EB network in such a short time.

"My academic journey as a fat scholar has been driven by the desire to fill gaps in the literature, particularly in theorizing the fat brown experience, which is deeply intertwined with colonial discourses of the body."

Ramanpreet Bahra

I believe this aligns with the vision May Friedman, Carla Rice, and Jen Rinaldi called for in Thickening Fat: Fat Bodies, Intersectionality, and Social Justice (2019). As a collective, we have thickened fat studies through our relationality and entanglements with individuals across intersections, institutions, and even transnationally, joining this living project. At the core of our practice, as Kelsey shares, is mentorship, which has been fruitful for our fat kinship practices. Between Kelsey and me, a love politics and non-hierarchical approach has been foundational to our collaborative work. As we co-manage the journal, we have become mentors not only to each other but also to our authors. One aspect I am proud of is the care and tenderness we have invested in the publishing process for our editorial team and authors. In a world where care is often distant from our realities of fat oppression, our gesture ensures everyone involved in the journal feels supported and part of our ‘excessive’ family.

Although you both have very unique research areas, a commonality that you share is making use of personal experience to ground your healthcare-related critiques and analyses, not only within traditional scholarship but also in outreach to the medical community about stigma and bias. Can you tell me a bit about your efforts (both collaboratively and individually) to use fat studies knowledge and feminist framings to intervene in often oppressive healthcare contexts?

Kelsey: On an individual level, I completed my doctoral dissertation at York University looking at the ways fatness acts as a barrier to accessing health care services for Canadian women. With the data from that, I have presented at many conferences, but the coolest thing I think I’m doing with my work is that I contribute to a set of “Praxis Pathway” courses in the B.HSc. program at McMaster University. These are courses that aim to provide students potential for action grounded in a strong sense of self and purpose, one’s relationship to others and the world, and the capacities for critical analysis, reflexivity, and ethical conduct. Here, I created a module for the "Critical Analysis & Reflexive" thread, where students engage in conversations and self-interrogation about power, privilege, equity, inclusion. This module explored how fatphobic experiences in health care settings and anti-fat biases held by health care professionals negatively impact the doctor-patient relationship. I had over 200 undergraduate students between the two courses attend the module over the last few semesters and engage with reflection on anti-fat bias in healthcare. This module, which I will continue to provide for the “Praxis Pathway” course, has been such a rewarding experience that provided the opportunity to get my research in front of the audience I created it for: future health care professionals.

Additionally, Raman and I collaborate on a lot of presentations and workshops! Together, we work on Excessive Bodies, but also present about anti-fat bias in healthcare settings to many different audiences, including healthcare professionals and healthcare social workers. We are currently preparing a workshop for the new year for medical school doctor candidates at the University of Toronto on anti-fat bias in healthcare. 

Raman: I would like to mention that my connection with Kelsey precedes our time as co-managers of EB. Let me share a quick story: in an effort to build community between the incoming cohort and the upper year students in the Sociology program at York, we were paired up with buddies. I was fortunate enough to meet my wonderful buddy, Kelsey, at our department welcome lunch. From there, Kelsey and I transformed our friendship into a collaborative relationship, starting with Fat Studies in Canada: (Re)Mapping the Field (2023), Excessive Bodies, and various presentations/workshops. Our objective for the workshops has been to advance critical fat praxis within the communities we are involved with. For instance, in association with the Knowledge Hub at Western University’s Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women and Children (London, Ontario) and Fraser Health Authority (British Columbia), we have presented “Fat Studies 101” workshops to audiences of over 100 people at both events. As members of the Canadian Sociological Association, we set up and chaired fat studies-centred panels at Congress 2024 and are continuing this tradition next year through our newly established Fat Studies Research Cluster with the Canadian Sociological Association. All in all, we continue to collaborate on multiple projects with the primary goal of knowledge mobilization.

In my individual projects, fat studies and critical disability studies have become my home and calling. As a first-generation fat brown femme, both spaces have provided a point of entry for understanding my lived experiences. Additionally, they offered a sense of community as I navigated the academic pipeline—an institution that has been foreign to my bloodline. My academic journey as a fat scholar has been driven by the desire to fill gaps in the literature, particularly in theorizing the fat brown experience, which is deeply intertwined with colonial discourses of the body.

Ramanpreet Annie Bahra (she/her) is a PhD student in the Sociology department at York University, Canada. Her research concentrates on social theory, fat studies, and disability studies as I examine intersectional experiences of the body, embodiment and affect within the South Asian diaspora using research-creation methodological practices. As a contract faculty member at Wilfrid Laurier University, she aims to bring forth a bodymind- and student-centered approach to the space, with a focus on relationality, emotionality, and creative praxis. She is one of the co-editors of the anthology, Fat Studies in Canada: (Re)Mapping the Field (2023); the co-manager-in-chief for Excessive Bodies: A Journal of Artistic and Critical Fat Praxis and Worldmaking; co-chair of the Fat Studies Research Cluster with the Canadian Sociological Association; and Junior Fellow with the Centre of Fat Liberation and Scholarship.
Dr. Kelsey Ioannoni is a fat solo mom, a critical health sociologist, and a fat studies scholar whose work explores the way that body size, specifically fatness, impacts the ability of fat Canadian women to access health care services. Moving forward, Kelsey is passionate about investigating the ways in which fat women experience discrimination related to reproductive health and access to reproductive assistance, and fat mothering.

"In taking up the ‘auto/biographical I’ in my work, I can account for my own intellectual knowledge in relation to my participants. This approach has been crucial in my work. When I interview other fat folks about their experiences, our interviews are less formal and we exchange experiences with each other. We laugh together, cry together, and generally grieve the trauma we’ve experienced navigating the world in a fat body."

Kelsey Ioannoni

Much of my graduate and published work is grounded in my personal experience, as it is how I make sense of social theory and my world-makings. At the end of the day, theorizing is a form of experimentation, much like our bodies. Storytelling via autoethnographic methodology offers a nuanced critique and an opportunity for readers to practice a form of ‘deep learning’—building connections between my stories and their own social worlds. In my commitment to advancing dialogues on healthcare-related critiques and other institutions, I aim to pave the way for individuals living in fat brown bodies similar to mine to share their experiences. Additionally, I hope those engaging with my work are able to reflect on the notions of fat embodiment, temporality, and spatiality in their own social worlds. As a fat educator, I weave fat and feminist framings of my lived experiences and barriers to healthcare into my course directorships. I have found this to be a helpful strategy for students to understand what is sometimes very heavy and dense (yes, pun intended) course material and to build their ‘critical thinking toolkits.’ At the end of the day, we all are witnesses to the ‘becomings,’ the stories of people, making it an excellent way to disseminate the valuable teachings of this interdisciplinary field.

I want to pick up on what Ramanpreet just said about the importance of “becomings” and “the stories of people” in your critical pedagogies. Could you elaborate a bit more on how the academic and community work you’ve engaged in has impacted your own becomings? How have these intersectional, fat, feminist teachings informed the unique ways you (re-)write your stories as people?

Kelsey: Building on what Raman has said, much of my published work incorporates my own ‘becomings.’ While working on my dissertation, one of my committee members shared with me the methodological approach of auto/biography, an approach which argues for the recognition of the emotional and personal involvement of the researcher to the research process (Letherby, 2002; Stanley, 1993). In doing sociological research, Stanley (1993) highlights the importance of the ‘auto/biographical I’ — a sociologist who is concerned with constructing, instead of discovering, sociological knowledge and social reality. In conducting fat studies research, I take up the ‘auto/biographical I,' recognizing that knowledge is situated, contextual, specific, and can come from personal experience (Stanley, 1993). So, in taking up the ‘auto/biographical I’ in my work, I can account for my own intellectual knowledge in relation to my participants. 

This approach has been crucial in my work. When I interview other fat folks about their experiences, our interviews are less formal and we exchange experiences with each other. We laugh together, cry together, and generally grieve the trauma we’ve experienced navigating the world in a fat body. Our stories intersect, weave together, and diverge based on our lived experiences and identities, but overall we are co-constructing knowledge and dialogues on the fat body, together. 

Raman: My origin story as an intersectional fat feminist scholar has been shaped by social, cultural, and material forces. Autoethnography as a methodology has allowed me to effectively make sense of the relational, spatial, and temporal elements of my fat, brown, femme becomings. Another key part of my story is the influence of the life stories and teachings of critical disability scholar, the late Dr. James Overboe. His work has impacted my intellectual curiosity in critical pedagogies that centre voices and stories erased from mainstream outlets, including academia. In past projects with Dr. Overboe, whether completed or not, I have held onto the critical pedagogies arising from feminist new materialism, disability studies, and fat studies. These perspectives have offered a fresh way to re-think fatness as a process of becoming(s) constantly influenced by the social world. This reminds us of the crucial importance of collectively working to bring the stories of marginalized communities to the forefront.

As Kelsey notes, we navigate our social worlds through storytelling and move through the ebbs and flows as we co-construct knowledge practices of fatness. I find my ‘becomings’ take root and flight through the relationships I have with colleagues in the field, the literature which I treat as my fat, crip ancestors, and the stories of countless Panjabi women (and South Asian women in general) with whom I find my own stories merging. Our intellectual projects and hope for knowledge mobilization are constantly situated in our social worlds and their assemblages. I believe this itself speaks to the fluid and transformative nature of a collaborative approach. Together, Kelsey and I aim to expand our intersectional fat feminist teachings across multiple spaces and timelines, so that it is not just about (re-)writing these stories but creating a community actively engaging with a politics of transgression and storytelling which changes social scripts and promotes fat liberation.


Mackenzie Edwards is a PhD candidate in Gender, Feminist, and Women’s Studies at York University. Her research uses queer, anti-capitalist, and disability influenced approaches to study fatness and representation/resistance in popular and social media. Mackenzie’s dissertation research explores the body positivity movement on Instagram in Tkaronto/Toronto and the limits of embodied activism online. She is the Communications Officer of CUPE 3903 and a member of the Centre for Feminist Research's Critical Femininities Cluster, as well as a co-editor and social media manager of Excessive Bodies.


References

Bahra, R. A., & Ioannoni, K. (2023). An excessively fat introduction. Excessive bodies: A journal of artistic and critical fat praxis and world making, 1(1), 1-24.

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: an overview. Historical social research/Historische sozialforschung, 36(4), 273-290.

Friedman, M., Rice, C. & Rinaldi, J. (Eds.) (2019). Thickening fat: Fat bodies, intersectionality, and social justice. Routledge.

Letherby, G. (2002). Auto/biography in research and research writing. In G. Lee-Treweek & S. Linkogle (Eds.), Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research (pp. 91-113). Routledge.

Rice, C., Harrison, E., & Friedman, M. (2019). Doing justice to intersectionality in research. Cultural studies ↔ critical methodologies, 19(6), 409-420.

Stanley, L. (1993). On auto/biography in sociology. Sociology, 27(1), 41-52.

Taylor, A., Ioannoni, K., Bahra, R.A., Evans, C., Scriver, A. & Friedman, M. (Eds.). (2023). Fat studies in Canada: (Re)mapping the field. Inanna. 

Thompson, B. (2017). Teaching with tenderness: Toward an embodied practice. University of Illinois Press.