Table of Contents
|
Freedom of Expression and the Press Jamie Cameron/Christopher Bredt VOLUME 1 I. PERSPECTIVES ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION A. INTRODUCTION I-2 B. RATIONALES AND PURPOSES I-2 The marketplace of ideas: Abrams v. United States I-3 Democratic government: The Alberta Press Case I-5 Self-realization I-7 C. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS I-9 D. CHARTER INTERPRETATION AND SECTION 2(b) I-12 The role of tradition I-12 An introduction to the First Amendment I-12
II. A METHODOLOGY OF EXPRESSIVE FREEDOM (updated Jan/2001) A. INTRODUCTION II-2 B. IRWIN TOY v. A-G QUEBEC II-3 Irwin Toy v. A-G Quebec II-3 C. THE MEANING OF AEXPRESSION@ UNDER SECTION 2(b) II-14 Section 2(b) of the Charter II-14 Picketing: RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd. II-15 United Food and Commercial Workers v. KMart Canada Ltd. . . . . . . . . II-17 The peace camp: Weisfeld v. Canada II-29 Lap dancing: Ontario Adult Entertainment Bar Assn. v. Toronto II-32 The circus: Stadium Corp. v. City of Toronto II-35 The First Amendment II-37 The draft card case: U.S. v. O=Brien II-37 Flag burning: Texas v. Johnson II-39 Nude dancing: Barnes v. Glen Theatre Inc. II-42 Panhandling: Young v. New York City Transit Authority II-46 A Note on Step Two and the Purpose-Effect Distinction II-50 D. THE CONTEXTUAL APPROACH UNDER SECTION 1 II-52 Step 1: Edmonton Journal v. A-G Alberta II-52 Step 2: Rocket v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons II-55 Step 3: R. v. Keegstra II-57 Step 4: RJR-MacDonald v. A-G Canada II-63
III. GOVERNMENT PROPERTY, EXPRESSIVE FREEDOM AND THE PUBLIC FORUM A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES III-2 A.G. Canada v. Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada III-3 City of Peterborough v. Ramsden III-18 B.C.G.E.U. v. A-G British Columbia III-28 A note on First Amendment forum doctrine III-32 International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee III-34 B. ABORTION PICKETING III-41 R. v. Lewis III-41 A-G Ontario v. Dieleman III-57 Frisby v. Schultz III-61 Madsen v. Women=s Health Centre III-63 C. PRIVATE PROPERTY AND PUBLIC ACCESS III-65 Harrison v. Carswell III-65 Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc. III-69
IV. DEFAMATION A. INTRODUCTION IV-2 B. SEDITIOUS LIBEL IV-3 Switzman v. Elbling IV-4 C. CONTEMPT OF COURT IV-6 R. v. Kopyto IV-6 D. LIBEL IV-10 Introduction IV-10 Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto IV-13 R. v. Lucas IV-29 E. THE FIRST AMENDMENT IV-48 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan IV-48 Hustler Magazine v. Falwell IV-54
V. DISCRIMINATORY EXPRESSION A. INTRODUCTION V-2 B. CRIMINAL SANCTIONS V-3 R. v. Keegstra V-3 R. v. Zundel V-24 C. HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION V-37 Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor V-36 Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15 V-44 Human Rights Amendment Act, 1993 V-53 D. THE FIRST AMENDMENT V-54 Beauharnais v. Illinois V-54 R.A.V. v. St. Paul V-59 Wisconsin v. Mitchell V-64 Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America V-66 Doe v. University of Michigan V-73
VI. OBSCENITY AND PORNOGRAPHY A. INTRODUCTION VI-2 B. SEXUAL EXPRESSION AND THE CHARTER VI-3 R. v. Butler VI-3 R. v. Hawkins VI-19 R. v. Mara VI-22 Gender-based harm VI-29 C. CHILD PORNOGRAPHY VI-33 Re Eli Langer VI-33 D. CUSTOMS VI-48 Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice) VI-48 E. THE FIRST AMENDMENT VI-66 Roth v. United States VI-66 American Booksellers Association v. Hudnut VI-71 Skyywalker Records Inc. v. Navarro VI-74
* SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY B-1 VOLUME 2 [1997 version. Vol. 2 not updated yet for 1999.] [chapter VII only updated Jan/2001, as shown here]
VII. POLITICAL EXPRESSION AND THE ELECTORAL PROCESS A. INTRODUCTION VII-2 Excerpt, the Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing (Lortie Commission) VII-3 Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce VII-6 B. LIMITS ON THIRD PARTY PARTICIPATION VII-9 Somerville v. A-G of Canada VII-9 Libman v. Quebec (Attorney General) VII-17 Harper v. Canada VII-32 C. OTHER RESTRICTIONS ON POLITICAL PARTICIPATION VII-40 1. Opinion Poll Blackout VII-40 Thomson Newspapers Co. v. A-G Canada VII-40 2. Restrictions on Parties and Re-Imbursement of Expenses VII-58 Re MacKay et al. and Government of Manitoba VII-58 Figueroa v. Canada (Attorney General) VII-633. Public Servants and Partisan Politics VII-67 Osborne v. Canada VII-67 4. Voting Rights VII-75 Haig v. Chief Electoral Officer VII-75 D. AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE VII-80 Bellotti v. Baird VII-84 Branti v. Finkel VII-87 VIII. COMMERCIAL EXPRESSION A. INTRODUCTION VIII-2 B. SECTION 2(B) VIII-3 C. REASONABLE LIMITS UNDER S. 1 VIII-7 Reference Re ss. 193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code VIII-14 Rocket v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario VIII-20 RJR - MacDonald Inc. v. A-G Canada VIII-26 Bill C-71, Tobacco Act, 1996 VIII-42 D. AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE VIII-50 IX. COMPELLED EXPRESSION A. INTRODUCTION IX-1 B. GENERAL PRINCIPLES IX-2 R. v. Big M Drug Mart IX-2 Roach v. Minister of Citizenship IX-3 West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette IX-7 Wooley v. Maynard IX-9 C. MANDATORY LABELS IX-12 Meese v. Keene IX-12 R.J.R. MacDonald v. A-G Canada IX-16 D. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS IX-18 Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson IX-18 Lavigne v. O.P.S.E.U. et al. IX-27 Keller v. State Bar of California IX-47 X. GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE MEDIA A. THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK X-2 Royal Commission on Newspapers (Kent Commission)1981 (Chapter 2CThe Public Trust (extracts)) X-2 A Statement of Principles for Canadian Daily Newspapers X-9 Broadcasting Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-9 (extracts) X-11 Law Reform Commission of CanadaCCRTC Study (extracts) X-15 Royal Commission on Newspapers (Kent Commission)1981 (Chapter 14CRecommendations (extracts)) X-20 New Brunswick Broadcasting Co. v. C.R.T.C. X-22 B. RATIONALES FOR REGULATION X-26a Spectrum Scarcity Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C. X-26 Public Property Re CFRB and Attorney General of Canada et al. X-33 Culture/National Unity Report of the Task Force on Broadcasting Policy (1986) X-36 Privacy Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation X-38 C. CONTENT REGULATION X-45 National Indian Brotherhood v. Juneau X-45 Les Entreprises de Radiodiffusion de la Capitale Inc. (CHIRC Quebec) X-48 D. ACCESS TO THE MEDIA X-56 Trieger v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. X-56 Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing (Lortie Commission) X-59 Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo X-63 XI. NEWSGATHERING A. INTRODUCTION XI-2 Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. A-G New Brunswick [Re R. v. Carson] XI-2 B. THE PRESS AND SECTION 8 XI-7 Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick XI-7 Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Lessard XI-13 C. AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE XI-22 Zurcher v. Stanford Daily XI-22 Branzburg v. Hayes XI-31 Pell v. Procunier XI-41 XII. ACCESS TO PROCEEDINGS A. INTRODUCTION XII-2 B. ACCESS TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS XII-3 Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. A-G New Brunswick [Re R. v. Carson] XII-3 C. ACCESS TO OTHER PROCEEDINGS XII-13 Pacific Press Ltd. v. Canada XII-14 Travers v. Canada XII-19 Southam Inc. v. A-G Canada XII-23 D. ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS XII-25 Vickery v. Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Prothonotary) XII-25 Leader Post v. Neuls XII-34 Dr. A v. C XII-36 E. ACCESS BY ELECTRONIC OR AUDIO MEDIA XII-39 Kingston Whig-Standard v. Ontario (A-G) XII-39 R. v. Squires XII-43 New Brunswick Broadcasting Co. v. Nova Scotia XII-49 F. AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE XII-53 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia XII-53 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court XII-56 XIII. PUBLICATION BANS A. INTRODUCTION XIII-2 B. FAIR TRIAL XIII-3 Dagenais v. C.B.C. XIII-3 Re Global Communications Ltd. and Attorney-General for Canada XIII-18 Manitoba (Attorney-General) v. Groupe Quebecor Inc. XIII-20 R. v. Bernardo XIII-22 C. PRIVACY XIII-24 Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General) XIII-24 Canadian Newspapers Co. v. A.G. Canada XIII-35 John Doe v. C.B.C. XIII-38 D. AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE XIII-46 Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart XIII-46 Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn XIII-49 |
|