IP Litigation Practice

The WaterRower: A Work of Art “Oar” Not?

Federal Court Breaks Silence: Declares Sonos did not Infringe Google's Noise Cancelling Technology Patent

Litigation as a Source of Profit? Non-Practicing Entities and Patent Litigation

Little Guy Fighting Goliath—Sonos’s Victory Against Google in Patent Infringement

Offence Or Defence? China’s New Legal “Weapon” Against Intellectual Property Theft Claims and The US’ Response

Ontario Court Of Appeal Finds Insurance Coverage Does Not Apply To Cyber Hack

A Year in the Life of Three Oxford Moot Finalists

Decision in "Sim & McBurney v En Vogue Sculptured Nail Systems Inc."

An Unexpected Infringement: There and Back Again

On March 16, 2015, Justice Barnes held that AstraZeneca’s Patent No 1,292,693 (“’693 Patent”), a formulation patent for omeprazole, was valid and infringed by Apotex (2015 FC 322). This decision represents the latest entry in the 22-year old cross-jurisdictional Omeprazole saga between AstraZeneca and Apotex. Because the proceedings were bifurcated, a separate reference for damage […]

An Interview with Owen Byrd from Lex Machina

I had the opportunity to speak with Owen Byrd, the Chief Evangelist and General Counsel for the Legal Analytics company Lex Machina. Based in Menlo Park, California, Lex Machina is one of the many legal technology startup companies that has recently sprouted in the Silicon Valley area. As a leader in the intersection of legal […]