Home » 2011

Canada v PHS Community Services Society: Interjurisdictional Immunity - Remaining Uncertainties and the Resulting Implications

This post is one of two winning papers submitted by JD students at Osgoode Hall Law School, York University as a written assignment for Prof. Richard Haigh's State and Citizen course. In its 2007 ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") addressed the controversies regarding interjurisdictional immunity in Canadian Western Bank v The Queen in […]

Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society: Part II, Life, Liberty and Security of the Person in Vancouver’s Downtown East Side

This is the second part of a two-part post regarding Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society. Part I can be found here.  Section 7: Life, Liberty and Security of the Person in Vancouver’s Downtown East Side The claimants in (case) having failed to establish that the criminal prohibitions on possession and trafficking in the Controlled […]

An Analysis of the Inapplicability of Interjurisdictional Immunity to the Insite Decision and its Implications for the Further Centralization of Powers

This post is one of two winning papers submitted by JD students at Osgoode Hall Law School, York University as a written assignment for Prof. Richard Haigh's State and Citizen course. The doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity, which can be used to challenge statutes on the ground of division of powers, seeks to limit the applicability […]

Whatcott v Saskatchewan (Human Rights Tribunal): Part II, What to do with Whatcott?

Whatcott v Saskatchewan (Human Rights Tribunal) Part I outlined the grounds on which the tribunal’s decision was upheld at the trial level. Whatcott appealed again, and found a sympathetic ear at Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal. Here is how the rest of Whatcott’s journey to the SCC unfolds. Anti-gay demonstrator Bill Whatcott will soon learn what the […]

US v Jones: Tracking Our Expectation of Privacy

The oral argument in the case of US v Jones before the US Supreme Court started off with an odd imaginative exercise. Chief Justice Roberts asked the court to impose the allegedly unconstitutional actions of the police onto the justices of the Court, and mull over the implications of such an imposition. That is, Chief Justice […]

Erring on the Side of Caution: R v Sarrazin

In R v Sarrazin, [2011] 3 SCR 505 [Sarrazin], the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") passed down its latest pronouncement on the availability of the curative proviso.  At issue was whether the requirements for application of the curative proviso should be relaxed, and whether the proviso applied on the facts of the case to deny the […]

Neighbouring Tribunals and ‘Lateral Adjudicative Poaching’: Forum Shopping for Human Rights in British Columbia v Figliola

One necessary implication of the growth of the administrative state—and the legislative delegation of various social and economic responsibilities to the executive—is the diffusion of human rights jurisdiction over a broad cross-section of decision-makers. To the degree that a large number of actors and tribunals make decisions with either direct or incidental effects on people’s […]

General Motors v City National Leasing: A Primer to the National Securities Regulator Reference

Last April, the Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments regarding the constitutionality of the proposed national securities regulator. Broadly, the issue was whether the proposed Canada Securities Act [Act] was a valid exercise of the federal government’s trade and commerce power under s. 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867. With the Legal Post reporting that the […]