Home » 2012 » October

At the Court: What’s in a judgment?

How much of a party’s submissions can a judge incorporate into the judgment without attribution? Setting aside issues of honesty in scholarship, the Court will have the opportunity to address the duties and responsibilities of judges in Eric Victor Cojocaru, et al. v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Center, et al. At stake is […]

BULLETIN: Supreme Court Rules in Opitz v Wrzesnewskyj, No Byelection in Etobicoke-Centre

Today, at 9:45 AM, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered judgment in Opitz v Wrzesnewskyj 2012 SCC 55. The case was launched by defeated Liberal incumbent Borys Wrzesnewskyj, who lost his Etobicoke-Centre seat in the 2011 Federal election to Conservative Ted Opitz by 26 votes. Wrzesnewskyj and his lawyers were able to convince Justice Lederer of the […]

R v CD: "Frailties in Evidence" and Post-Offense Injury Considerations in Sentencing

In R v CD, 2012 ONCA 696 the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously substituted a 30-month prison sentence for a two-year conditional sentence due to the "extraordinary" circumstances of the facts of the case. The appellant was a quadriplegic convicted of multiple counts of sexual assault against a minor living in the house above the […]

At the Court: Paving the Way Forward with Antrim Truck Centre v Minister of Transportation

Last December, the Court of Appeal for Ontario decided in favour of the Minister of Transportation, finding that highway construction that rerouted traffic (i.e. customers) away from an existing highway was not a sufficient ground for compensation for business owners. Antrim Truck Centre operated a truck stop on Highway 17 outside Ottawa for almost thirty […]

Appeal Watch: Telus Communications Company v. Her Majesty the Queen

On October 15, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada heard an appeal by Telus Communications to quash a General Warrant and Assistance Order to produce daily records of all text messages sent and received by two Telus subscribers in connection with a police investigation. The main issue in this case is whether a General Warrant […]

BULLETIN: SCC Releases Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Inc.

This morning, the SCC dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal in Canada v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2012 SCC 52, a highly anticipated decision dealing with transfer pricing under s. 69(2) (now s.247(2)) of the Income Tax Act. The Minister of National Revenue reassessed Glaxo Canada for the taxation years 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993 on the basis […]