Home » 2013 » September

R v Griffith: What Happens When a Judge Changes His/Her Mind?

In R v Griffith, 2013 ONCA 510, a decision released by the Ontario Court of Appeal on August 9, 2013, the court was faced with an unusual series of events. The trial judge in this case, having considered the available evidence and submissions, found the defendant guilty of firearm-related offences. Upon careful consideration, however, the […]

News Brief: The Victim's Story from a Landmark Case on Attempted Murder

Normal 0 One of the most important criminal law cases decided under the Charter is R. v. Logan, [1990] 2 SCR 731.  The case involved the robbery of a Becker's milk store, in which an 18 year old store clerk, Barbara Turnbull, was shot in the neck and became a quadriplegic. Four men involved in […]

Race, Gender, and Religion in the Courtroom: Three Critical Implications of R v NS – Part II

In Part II of this comment on R v NS, 2012 SCC 72, I raise two additional implications of the case related to equity, inclusion and fairness. B. Religion and Culture in Bite-Sized Chunks The reasoning of the majority decision presents an incomplete picture of Canadian history and obscures “made-in-Canada” xenophobia in a way that impacts all racialized and […]

SCC Declines to Distinguish Between Express and Implied Verbal Statements for the Purpose of Hearsay Analysis and Applies a Principled Approach to Admitting Drug Purchase Calls in R v Baldree

In May 2006, two police officers responded to a report of a possible break-and-enter. Inside an apartment they found a pound of marijuana alongside an open safe containing 90 grams of cocaine. Four people were arrested. At the station, a cellphone belonging to one of the detainees rang and was answered by a police officer. […]

Creating Confusion from the Ambiguous: Agraira v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Agraira v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) 2013 SCC 36 asked the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) to determine whether the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (“Minister”)’s decision to deny ministerial relief to an alleged terrorist should be remitted to the administrative body. Yet, in trying to make sense of the Minister’s decision, LeBel […]

An Entry Point to the Charter: Is There a Constitutional Right to a Prison Transfer?

Section 6 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the "Charter") protects the mobility rights of Canadian citizens and, specifically, the right of every citizen to enter, reside in, and leave Canada. In essence, section 6 is “the right to have rights,”  as it is only upon entering the country that Canadians enjoy the […]

Pre-Sentence Custody: ONCA Wades in the Murky Waters of Enhanced Credit

In R v Summers, 2013 ONCA 147 and subsequently R v Curry, 2013 ONCA 420, the Ontario Court of Appeal tackled the issue of exactly what circumstances allow for enhanced credit to be given for pre-sentence custody upon a finding of guilt. Following legislative changes in early 2010, the standard of giving 2:1 credit evaporated […]