Home » 2013 » November (Page 2)

Cutting the Wire but Not the Responsibility - Peracomo Inc v Telus

On November 15, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will hear Peracomo Inc v Telus (“Peracomo”) a case where the sole officer and directing mind of a fishing company is trying to escape the consequences that stem from his deliberate decision to cut a telephone line cable. This case explicitly deals with Maritime Law. It […]

The Criminal Code and Industrial Accidents: R v Metron Construction and the Ghosts of Westray

etucker 9.2720 Normal 0 Deaths due to occupational causes outnumber homicides in Canada by about two to one. Many of these deaths stem from negligence, and critics charge that enforcement measures are lax. In a major departure, a record fine for corporate criminal negligence was imposed in R v Metron Construction Corporation, 2013 ONCA 541, after four Toronto […]

Self-Induced Provocation Is No Defence to Murder: SCC in R v Cairney, R v Pappas

In the wake of two recent Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decisions, the partial defence of provocation has been narrowed. The SCC grappled with the legal interpretation of particularly ‘sympathetic’ moral circumstances underlying murder charges on appeal in R v Cairney, 2013 SCC 55 (Cairney), and R v Pappas, 2013 SCC 56 (Pappas). While the […]

Removing a Sitting Mayor From Office: A Heavy Legal Lift

Rob Ford’s admission that he did in fact smoke crack cocaine on video set off a political crisis at Toronto City Hall. It did not, however, trigger a legal crisis. This is because the law is very clear on Toronto city council’s authority to remove a sitting mayor from office—it can’t. Section 6(1) of Ontario’s […]

R v O'Brien: When "Threats" Equate to "Threatening"

In legal terms, evaluating the form of a statement as a threat is a somewhat complicated matter. On a daily basis, individuals interact with one another using ever evolving idiosyncratic nuances, based largely upon their lifelong experiences of engaging in those precise types of interactions. What one person might take as a compliment another might […]

Victory for Consumers in Recent Supreme Court Class Action Certification Trilogy

On October 31st, the Supreme Court decided three appeals concerned with certification of class action lawsuits. All three cases involved claims related to overcharging and price-fixing. In two cases, the class action was allowed to proceed, and in one, the application for certification was dismissed. Not only do the lawsuits represent millions of dollars in […]

Why Not Equity? BC (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products 2013 SCC 51

Arbitration is simply exciting because it allows parties to design a framework by which to resolve their conflict. This immense flexibility, though, also means that parties may not explicate all of the necessary rules. Herein lies the question: should a reference to rules, one of which grants equitable remedies, be sufficient to grant the arbitrator […]