Home » 2014 » January

Appeal Watch: Religiosity in Government to be Deliberated by SCC in MLQ v City of Saguenay

Over the past couple of decades, there have been calls to remove God from Canada’s national anthem, ban the wearing of religious symbols by public servants in Quebec, and abolish the recitation of the Lord’s Prayer (Freitag v Penetanguishene (Town) (1999), 47 OR (3d) 301 [Freitag]) during town council meetings in Ontario. The Bouchard-Taylor Commission on reasonable accommodation […]

Op-Ed: A Glimmer Of Hope For Juveniles Sentenced To Life Without Parole

On June 25, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court released its monumental decision in Miller v. Alabama ((2012) 132 S. Ct. 2455). The Court held that a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole (“LWOP”) for any offender who committed his offence while under the age of 18 is contrary to the eighth […]

Oral Arguments: Professor Alan Young on Bedford

Alan Young, Osgoode Professor and lead counsel in Canada v Bedford, 2013 SCC 72 provides an overview of the litigation strategy employed in his successful challenge to three criminal code provisions related to sex work. Drawing on the lessons learned from R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine, 2003 SCC 74, Professor Young outlines how he structured the […]

Banking for Federalism: SCC to hear Appeal in Bank of Montreal (BMO) v Marcotte

Banque de Montréal v Marcotte, 2012 QCCA 1396 [Marcotte, QCCA] is part of a trilogy of cases (Federation des Caisses Desjardins du Quebec v Marcotte, 2014 SCC 57, and Amex Bank of Canada v Adams, 2014 SCC 56) that question the banks’ role in society. All three of them will be heard at the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") in […]

Western Larch Limited v Di Poce Management Limited: The Enforceability of Shotgun Clauses

In Western Larch Limited v Di Poce Management Limited, 2013 ONCA 722 [Western Larch], a decision released on November 29, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the exercise of a shotgun buy-sell provision (a.k.a. a “shotgun clause”) in a partnership agreement. The motion judge, presiding over the Commercial List, found that the buy-sell offer […]

The Supreme Court Gives a Green Light to Summary Judgment in Hryniak v Mauldin

Normal 0 Commentators often refer to a crisis in civil justice.  Civil procedure is slow, complicated, and prohibitively expensive, putting it out of the reach of the average Canadian.   In 2010, the Ontario government amended the Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Regulation 194, with the aim of improving access to justice.  One aspect of this was […]

With Divided Medical Evidence in NCR Case, ONCA is Deferent to Jury: R v Downs

The not criminally responsible ("NCR") regime is currently the subject of media and public scrutiny, with the proposed reforms of Bill C-14 (formerly C-54; Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act) in the Senate. In the recent decision of R v Downs, 2014 ONCA 20 [Downs], the Ontario Court of Appeal ("ONCA") reviewed a case in which an […]

Supreme Court Throws Out Acquittal and Clarifies Offence of Uttering Threats in R v McRae

The accused was charged with uttering threats to cause death or bodily harm pursuant to Criminal Code, RSC, 1985, c. C-46, s. 264.1(1)(a) after stating that he would rearrange the face of a Crown prosecutor and kill the witnesses who had informed against him. The statements were made to fellow detainees while the accused was being held […]