Date
|
Tentative Topics
|
Suggested Readings / Presentations
|
Jan 5 |
||
PART 1: Basic
Concepts
|
||
Jan 12
|
Reference frames, coordinate
systems,
kinematics of translation and rotation. |
Soechting JF, Flanders M. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1992;15:167-91. Tweed D, Vilis T. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Oct;58(4):832-49. |
Jan 19 | Coordination, eye-head
shoulder geometry,
2-D vs. 3-D control, Donders’ laws for gaze and reach. |
Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head. Henriques DY, Medendorp WP, Gielen CC, Crawford JD. Neural control of three-dimensional eye and head movements.
|
Jan 26 | Cortical organization for
gaze vs. reach. |
Human parietal cortex in action. Imaging the premotor areas. Anatomical organization of the eye fields in the human and non-human primate frontal cortex. Amiez C, Petrides M. Specificity of human parietal saccade and reach regions during transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience 30(39): 13053-13065
|
|
PART 2: Encoding
and Updating
Visual Goals
|
|
Feb 2
|
Cancelled due to York Weather Closure | |
Feb 9 | Cancelled for CPS/CAPNet conference | |
Feb 16
|
A: Coding visual direction
(egocentric,
allocentric, extrapolation)
|
Human parietal "reach region" primarily encodes intrinsic visual direction, not extrinsic movement direction, in a visual motor dissociation task. BYRNE P. & CRAWFORD JD (2010) Combination of neuronal signals representing object-centered location and saccade direction in macaque supplementary eye field. |
Feb 23
|
Updating visual direction:
behaviour and
neural mechanism. |
Gaze-centered updating of visual space in human parietal cortex. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.
|
Mar 2 |
Encoding and updating in 3-D |
Updating target distance across eye movements in depth.
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 21;27(12):3268-73.
|
PART 3:
Feedforward
Transformations
|
|
|
Mar 9 |
Caculating the desired
movement vector from
goal and gaze/hand position. |
Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. (Leiko) Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Buneo CA, Jarvis MR, Batista AP, Andersen RA. Nature. 2002 Apr 11;416(6881):632-6. (Noura)
|
Mar 16
|
Reference Frame
transformations: Behaviour
Reference Frame Transformations:
Behavioral Aspects
|
Computations for geometrically accurate visually guided reaching in 3-D space. Blohm G, Crawford JD. J Vis. 2007 May 4;7(5):4.1-22.
|
Mar 23
|
Reference Frame
transformations: neural
mechanisms
|
The superior colliculus encodes gaze commands in retinal coordinates.
Decoding the cortical transformations for visually guided reaching in 3D space.
|
Mar 30 |
Neural Control of Three-Dimensional Gaze Shifts J. Douglas Crawford and Eliana M. Klier
|
|
Review | ||
April 6
|
Review Session |
|
Most classes will consist of an introduction by the professor, followed by 1-2 informal, interactive paper presentations on the topic, led by a student.
EVALUATION
Undergraduate student evaluation:
10% for participation in the class discussion about the selected articles.
30% for formal seminar presentations topical to the lecture at two different times.
10% for essay proposal with annotated bibliography, due six weeks before last class
50% for final essay, due the last day of the term.
Students will be responsible for giving an oral presentation on a topical article pertinent to the lecture of the day. They will do this twice so that they will have the opporunity to learn from their first presentation. The essay will be 3000-4000 words (not including references). It will describe a real-life situation (like catching a baseball, for example) in scientific terms, incorporating something from each lecture section. The purpose of this essay is not only to test the student’s knowledge, but more importantly to help them synthesize and apply this knowledge to real-world situations in a useful and memorable way. Undergraduates will be required to cite 15 papers and these may be review articles and/or papers covered in class. They will need to be able to coherently demonstrate that they understood the main concepts and where they apply. Undergraduates will receive formal feedback about their essay proposal.
Final Essay Due Aprl 1. 1% will be deducted for each day late.
Graduate Student evaluation:
20% for presentating articles and participation in the class discussion about the selected articles.
20% for formal seminar presentations topical to the lecture at two different times.
60% for final essay, due the last day of the term.
In the final essay (5000-6000 words), graduate students will be required to properly cite at least 30 journal articles. At least 20 of these must be original research papers (not reviews), including at least 10 papers that were not covered in the class. Graduate students will be required to show a greater depth of original synthesis and application of the concepts to a real life situation. Graduate students will require approval of their essay topic, but will not have to submit a formal proposal.
Final Essay Due April 1
©2010 The Visuomotor Neuroscience Lab
Web Design by Charlie Pettypiece
charlie.pettypiece@gmail.com