Package   Class  Deprecated  Index  Help 
 PREV CLASS   NEXT CLASS FRAMES    NO FRAMES    
SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD

Class LetterGuessingExperiment

java.lang.Object
  extended by LetterGuessingExperiment

public class LetterGuessingExperiment
extends java.lang.Object

LetterGuessingExperiment

Summary

Related References

Shannon's Letter-Guessing Experiment

The following is an excerpt from Shannon's paper, where the experiment is explained:

For the guessing mode described above, the participant is allowed one guess per letter.

Shannon also describes a second guessing mode, where the participant continues to guess until the correct letter is determined:

Both modes are implemented in this software.

Running the Experiment Software

Click here for instructions on launching/running the application.

Setup Parameters

Upon launching, the application presents a setup dialog:

The default parameter settings are read from a configuration file called LetterGuessingExperiment.cfg. This file is created automatically when the application is launched for the first time. The default parameter settings may be changed through the setup dialog. The setup parameters are as follows:

Parameter Description
Participant Code Identifies the current participant. This is used in forming the names for the output data files. Also, the sd2 output data file includes a column with the participant code.

Condition Code An arbitrary code used to associate a test condition with this invocation. This parameter might be useful if the software is used in an experiment where a condition is not inherently part of the application (e.g., Gender → male, female). The condition code is used in forming the name for the output data file. Also, the sd2 output data file contains a column with the condition code.

Note: The setup dialog does not include an entry for "Block code". The block code is generated automatically by the software.

Number of Phrases Specifies the number of phrases presented to the participant in the current block.

Phrases File Specifies the file from which phrases are selected for input. Phrases are drawn from the file at random. Typically, phrases2.txt is used. This is the phrase set published by MacKenzie and Soukoreff in 2003 (click here).

Beep on Error A checkbox item that, if set, configures the application to output an audible beep when the user makes an incorrect guess.

Guessing Mode Set the guessing mode, as per the two modes described by Shannon (see above).

The two guessing modes are as follows:

Mode 1 - One Guess Per Letter

Mode 1 is the one-guess mode, where the participant gets one guess per letter. Here's a sample dialog:

The text to guess is presented in the top line. It appears initially as a string of asterisks. The text is revealed letter by letter as guessing proceeds. The text in the second line is what Shannon called the "reduced text". Here, a dash indicates a correct guess, a letter indicates an incorrect guess.

Typical results popup:

KSPC is "keystrokes per character", computed as 

      KSPC = (correct + incorrect) / number_of_letters
For the one-guess mode, KSPC is always 1.00.

Mode 2 - Guess Until Correct

Mode 2 is the correct-guess mode. For each letter, the participant continues to guess until she guesses correctly. Here's a sample dialog:

For the correct-guess mode, the count is shown as a single character in the reduced text (second line). Counts above 9 appear as A (10), B (11), C (12), etc. Keys are darkened for incorrect guesses, as a reminder to the participant of letters already visited.

Typical results popup for the correct-guess mode:

Here, the number of correct guesses is always equal to the number of letters in the presented text. KSPC is very likely > 1, since the participant is likely to guess incorrectly, at least some of the time. (But, who knows, some people are pretty good at this. Click here to see an example from Wheel of Fortune.)

Output Data Files

Here are some example output data files:

One-guess mode:

Correct-guess mode:
The reduced text in the sd2 files is the same as appeared on the display during guessing. The reduced text in the sd1 files is slightly different, however. Here, the reduced text shows the actual guesses. For mode 1, this is a single character — the user's guess. For mode 2, this is a series of characters showing the progression of guesses.

The data in the sd2 files are full-precision, comma-delimited. Importing into a spreadsheet application provides a convenient method to examine the data on a phrase-by-phrase basis. The data in the sd2 example file above (correct-guess mode), are shown below as they might appear after importing into Microsoft Excel: (click to enlarge)

Actual output files use "LetterGuessingExperiment" as the base filename. This is followed by the participant code, the guessing mode, the condition code, and the block code, for example, LetterGuessingExperiment-P01-One_guess-C01-S01-B01.sd2.

Discussion

The data may be useful for follow-up analyses, for example, to estimate the user's skill in guessing. One approach is to compare the user's guesses against those that could be programmed by a language model. A simple language model might work with letter-frequency, digram-frequency, trigram-frequency, or quadgram-frequency lists. If guesses were done according to the language model, would the result be better or worse than the user's result? To illustrate, consider "picture" in the phrase "a picture is worth a thousand words". The quadgram-frequency list includes eight non-zero quadgrams beginning with "pic". Sorted by frequency, these are 
     pict  14739
     pica   9143
     pick   6907
     pic_   3598
     pici   3498
     pics   1838
     picu    749
     picn    567
The language model would work well here, since "t" is the first choice. Unfortunately, the language model would not do as well on the next guess, since "u" appears in the third-ranked quadgram beginning with "ict": 

     icti  22098
     ict_  15628
     ictu  14739
     icto  12354
     icts   2828
     icte   2746
     ictl   1885
     icta   1591
Furthermore, since humans inherently possess a vast knowledge of idioms and clichés in their native language, the user is likely to fair quite well (better than the language model?) as guessing proceeds deeper into the phrase. For example, most native speakers of English can easily complete the phrase, "a picture is worth a thousand ______". So, the comparison suggested — between the language model and the user — could be pursued in an overall sense or as a function of "position in phrase".

A more advanced language model might use a word list with part-of-speech (POS) tagging, as described in Improved word list ordering for text entry on ambiguous keyboards (Gong, Tarasewich, and MacKenzie, NordiCHI 2008).

The timestamp data might be useful in revealing how thoughtful the user was. Did the user think carefully about the guesses, or did the user appear to be hurried and guessing randomly?

Author:
Scott MacKenzie, 2011-2015, Steven Castellucci, 2014

Constructor Summary
LetterGuessingExperiment()
           
 
Method Summary
static void main(java.lang.String[] args)
           
 
Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object
equals, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, toString, wait, wait, wait
 

Constructor Detail

LetterGuessingExperiment

public LetterGuessingExperiment()
Method Detail

main

public static void main(java.lang.String[] args)
                 throws java.io.IOException
Throws:
java.io.IOException
Package   Class  Deprecated  Index  Help 
 PREV CLASS   NEXT CLASS FRAMES    NO FRAMES    
SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD