|
|
|
|
The objective of this paper was to assess whether television
is a Passive or Active experience, and if Frasier viewers interpret the
images of the show to create their own meanings. For our purposes, Active
means involvement with the show, either overt (discussions) or covert
(thinking), while Passivity refers to an uninvolved, unconcerned experience.
When asked explicitly if the process is Active or Passive, interviewees
explained that the show is designed to encourage active participation.
It is quick, witty and requires a mental effort to catch everything
thats going on. Like all other shows, Frasier requires that
the viewer invests a limited amount attention to understand the basic
storyline, therefore for a deeper understanding the viewer needs to invest
more attention. Generally respondents believe that its viewer and not
the show that decides if the experience is Passive or Active. If some
viewers want to be active and engage with the show to uncover alternative
meanings and interpretations, they will. If other viewers sit in front
of their TV sets, being bombarded with images and decide to be passive,
they will. The viewer that decides how to engage with the television program.
From the onset, we have treated Frasier as a text instead of a television
sitcom. If for a moment we consider the show in a larger realm, as a form
of artistic expression, we can further understand why multiple interpretations
and meanings are possible. All forms of art are open to various interpretations
by different people, in support of Stefan Hermanns argument that
television viewers are not passive, but instead interpret
television images in order to create their own meaning(s).
This idea is captured in the dialogue between Frasier and
his longtime mentor and therapist, Tewksbury.....
Frasier: But all art is self portraiture, and that
includes the written word.
Tewksbury: However, we can only view art through the lens of our
own psyches.
Frasier: Then there is no pure art.
[Episode 8.9, Frasiers Edge Jan 15, 2001]
George V Gadwah,
York University, Toronto
|
|