Critical Reading Exercises will help
-to develop your critical reading skills,
-to encourage preparation (rather than just reading) of the
course material,
-to facilitate student participation in class,
-to create the conditions for more student-directed discussion,
and
-to deepen your understanding of making change and women's
organizing.
Reading exercises are due on an ongoing basis throughout
the year.
In total, you will do Reading Exercises [RE] for 10 weeks
out of 17 possible choices. For four of the weeks, reading
exercises are required from everyone [RRE]. You will
choose the six additional weeks.
In the Fall semester, you will do 3 RRE plus 2 RE.
in the Winter semester, you will do 1 RRE plus 4 RE.
The weeks for the RRE and also the weeks from which
you can choose RE are noted on the course outline.
*You will choose your topics for your RE at the beginning
of the year.Use the list below to record your first choices.
We will negotiate collectively to distribute the readings
over the entire class.
*The RE are due the day of the discussion. These assignments
will not be accepted late for any reasons. However, if you
should be unable to complete one that you have signed up for,
you can choose another in the same semester. No substitutions
and no lates will be permitted for the RRE. So please plan
your time accordingly.
*Although for some weeks you will do your RE on only one or
a part of the assigned readings, allocate the time necessary
to do all the reading for each week. In order to make this
possible, there are no additional reading requirements for
any of your assignments.
It is very important that you do all the required reading
for Sept 23, Sept 30 and Oct 7.
*Below you will find instructions for RE on a single text,
for RE on multiple texts, and for each of the RRE.
Grade: The RE and RRE are worth a total of 40%
of your grade. Your grade on each one will take into account
both substance (insight, depth of understanding etc) and presentation
(writing style, grammar, clarity etc).
REQUIRED READING EXERCISES [RRE]
1. CLASSROOM AS A SITE OF POLITICAL PRACTICE [RRE]
(Fall)
2. THEORY AND PRACTICE [RRE] (Fall)
3. WOMEN'S ORGANIZING AND PUBLIC POLICY [RRE] (Fall)
4. PEACE ORGANIZING THROUGH COALITIONS [RRE] (Winter)
RE EXERCISES FOR FALL SEMESTER: Pick TWO
INTRODUCTION TO WOMEN ORGANIZING #2 [RE]
RE on Einwhoner OR Ruffman
THE CURRENT CONJUNCTURE [RE]
RE on Hamilton OR Hamilton OR Gabriel
FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD WAVE FEMINISMS [RE]
RE on Hamilton plus Harris OR Hamilton plus Adamson
ORGANIZING DIVERSITY INSIDE THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT [RE]
RE on Pheterson plus Gershbain, Hildebrant and Feinberg
OR Thompson plus Drediger, Gayle-Duetsch and Feinberg
ELECTORAL STRATEGIES AND REPRESENTATION [P] [RE]
RE on Vickers and Pauktuutit
OR on Young and Pauktuutit
READING EXERCISES FOR WINTER SEMESTER: Pick FOUR
GRASSROOTS FEMINIST ORGANIZING [RE]
RE on Luxton OR Egan OR Denis OR Hewitt-White
MATERNALIST ORGANIZING [RE]
RE on Werbner OR Swerdlow OR Krauss
(*Last day to hand in Step 1 of Action Project)
ORGANIZING FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE [RE]
RE on Tirado and McDermott
OR on Jhabvala and de Angelis
ANTI-FEMINISM [RE] (also be sure to read handouts from REALWOMEN)
RE on Faludi
OR on Messner and Blee
SEPARATE ORGANIZING [RE]
RE on Briskin and Herizons OR Freedman and Herizons
DEMOCRATIZATION AND WAYS OF WORKING [RE]
RE on Freeman plus Kirk
OR on Freeman plus Arnott
OR on Freeman plus Miles
BEIJING [RE] (also be sure to read handouts from REALWOMEN)
RE on Bunch, Roberts, Ruffman, and Villiers
OR on Ruffman, Tohidi and Day
(*Last day to hand in Step 3 of Action Project).
POST BEIJING [RE]
RE on Miles, Day, Bazilla and "It's Time.."
OR on Philipose, Ababio, Rahlston and "It's Time.."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR READING EXERCISES ON A SINGLE TEXT
1) Write an annotation
An annotation summarizes the author's argument and her conclusion.
An annotation does not include all the content or details.
Rather it highlights the central point and thesis and is conceptual
rather than descriptive.
In an annotation, you are 'speaking' in the voice of the
author, using your own words but attempting to be true to
the meaning and intention of the author. Your goal is not
to evaluate but to represent fairly what the author has said
and meant. Since you want to emphasize your own understanding
and ability to explain the text, do not quote directly from
the author.
ii) Identify and explain 1-2 important concepts which
the author uses to develop and support her argument. Why do
you find these concepts useful?
A concept helps to explain or make sense of data, detail,
information, and experience. It is a general idea or notion
that goes beyond the empirical and experiential, beyond what
we can observe or directly experience. So for example, 'stereotyping'
is a concept which can be used to interpret a range of specific
experiences.
Concepts are the building blocks of theories. So, combining
the concept of stereotyping with data on various forms of
stereotyping (in advertising, for example) and institutional
sites where it occurs, (in schools or families) provides the
foundation for a theory to explain the devaluation of women's
experiences.
Concepts are also 'portable', i.e., we can 'internalise'
them as part of our knowledge base to help us make sense of
other situations. So you might be studying another phenomenon
and realize that the concept of 'stereotyping' helps to make
sense of it.
Concepts should also be distinguished from 'method' which
refers to how an author constructs her argument. For example,
she may use comparison and contrast, an historical approach,
qualitative data such as interviews, quantitative data such
as statistics, personal experience, theoretical frameworks,
the research of others, etc.
iii) Outline your most important insight from this reading
(something you found interesting and provocative). In what
ways did this insight shift, challenge, expand or support
your thinking about women's organizing?
iv) Identify one statement, concept or argument that you
do not understand. Try to explain what it is you don't understand.
v) Prepare one question you would like the class to discuss:
a level 3, level 4 and/or 'experiential/point of view' question
(see Guide to Writing Questions below).
Length: 2 pages TYPED, DOUBLE SPACED
HAND IN THE ORIGINAL AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOURSELF. THIS IS
FOR YOUR PROTECTION.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR READING EXERCISES ON MULTIPLE TEXTS
i) Describe the common subject matter of these texts.
What does each article contribute to the study of this topic
area? Explain why you think these articles have been grouped
together under this specific topic? (For your information,
the topic areas are listed on pg 2 above and on the course
outline.)
ii) Identify and discuss one or more points of disagreement
and/or differences in political strategy
Political strategy refers to how to make change around
a particular issue. It emerges, in part, out of an analysis
of a problem. So, for example, if you think women's low pay
is a result of biological difference, you would not have many
strategic options (unless you could change biology). But if
you think that low pay is a result of weak government laws,
then you could put forward a strategy to strengthen the laws.
How you analyse a situation, then, has an impact on what strategies
you will endorse, develop or imagine.
iii) Outline your most important insight from this material
(something you found interesting and provocative). In what
ways did this insight shift, challenge, expand or support
your thinking about women's organizing?
iv) Identify one statement, concept or argument that you
did not understand. Try to explain what it is you don't understand.
v) Prepare one question you would like the class to discuss:
a level 3, level 4 and/or 'experiential/point of view' question
(see Guide to Writing Questions below).
Length: 2 pages TYPED, DOUBLE SPACED
HAND IN THE ORIGINAL AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOURSELF. THIS IS
FOR YOUR PROTECTION.
REQUIRED READING EXERCISE [RRE]:
CLASSROOM AS A SITE OF POLITICAL PRACTICE
Briskin, Feminist Pedagogy
*Fleming et al, "Gender, Power and Silence in the Classroom."
*Trosset, "Obstacles to Open Discussion and Critical
Thinking"
1. Carol Trosset's research revealed some interesting student
attitudes toward discussion. Based on Trosset's article, analyse
your own attitudes:
a) For you, is the purpose of discussion exploration or advocacy?
Explain.
b) Is it important for a discussion to reach a consensus?
Why or why not?
c) Would you subscribe to a position of radical relativism?
Why or why not?
d) How important is 'comfort' and 'safety' for your learning?
What does 'comfort' and safety' in the classroom actually
look like for you?
e) When you work in small groups, do you prefer to be with
students who have a similar perspective to you? Why or why
not?
2. The article on "Gender, Power and Silence in the Classroom"
was written by students at York and first published in 1991.
To what extent do the incidents described in this article
reflect your own experiences? To what extent do you think
the situation has improved? Refer to specific examples in
your answer.
3. In Feminist Pedagogy, I make the argument that
feminist pedagogical strategies which reject teacher authority
in favour of sharing power with students are important but
also problematic. Summarize the argument.
To what extent have your Women Studies classes attempted
to 'share power'? Describe both the successes, and the problems
you have experienced with this approach.
4. Explain the distinction between non-sexism/non-racism
and anti-sexism/anti-racism. Describe the political practice
which emerges from each political position.
5. Based on your own priorities, and your reading of the
summary of student comments from the "Developing Groundrules"
exercise, identify three groundrules which you would like
included in a class contract designed to make our classroom
time as effective as possible.
LENGTH: 3 pages
TYPED and double-spaced. Hand in the original and keep a
copy for yourself.
REQUIRED READING EXERCISE [RRE]: THEORY AND PRACTICE
Patricia Elliot and Nancy Mandell. "Feminist Theories."
Linda Briskin. "Socialist Feminism: from the standpoint
of practice."
1. Elliot and Mandell outline a range of different feminist
perspectives: liberal feminism, socialist feminism, radical
feminism, anti-racist feminism, psychoanalytic feminism and
postmodernist feminism.
Choose two of these feminisms (one of the first three and
one of the second three). Explain and assess the strategic
implications of each of these approaches. How does each handle
issues of diversity among women?
What does it mean to talk about 'strategic implications'?
All theories offer a perspective on how to make change,
that is, a political strategy. Sometimes this perspective
is made explicit, sometimes it is self evident, and sometimes
it is buried and needs to be 'excavated'.
Political strategy emerges, in part, out of an analysis
of a problem. So, for example, if you think women's low pay
is a result of biological difference, you would not have many
strategic options (unless you could change biology). But if
you think low pay is a result of weak government laws, then
you could put forward a strategy to strengthen the laws. How
you analyse a situation, then, has an impact on what strategies
you will endorse, develop or imagine.
The feminist approaches outlined in "Feminist Theories"
have different analyses of what causes women's oppression.
Your task is to explore what strategies emerge from their
analyses. To put it another way, what kind of change do feminists
who subscribe to each position think is possible and necessary
(given their understanding of the problems women face,) and
how do they think we should go about making such a change.
2. In my article, I suggest an alternative way of examining
the range of feminisms based on a model of feminist practice
(rather than theory). Explain the framework of disengagement
and mainstreaming, and the risk each approach faces.
2a) Describe a mainstreaming and a disengagement strategy
to deal with one of the following issues: sexual assault,
job losses due to free trade, and cutbacks in social services.
How useful is the model of mainstreaming and disengagement
to understand the change-making process?
3. "The question is not whether we have a theory, but
how aware we are of the assumptions behind our actions, and
how conscious we are of the choices we make -- daily -- among
different theories."
Charlotte Bunch, "Not by Degrees... (1983)."
Describe the 'worldview' that informs your everyday life.
Are you surprised by what emerged when you did this description?
Why or why not?
Although we rarely attempt to name it fully or examine it
directly, we all have a 'worldview' -- an understanding of
the way the world works and how we think it ought to work
-- which influences the way we live. To ensure that we are
not simply motivated by commonsense and uninterrogated assumptions
from the dominant ideology, we need to articulate consciously
our own worldview and query the source of our ideas. Our informed
worldview, then, can become a positioning from which we make
sense of and interact with the world.
Length: 3 pages TYPED, DOUBLE SPACED
HAND IN THE ORIGINAL AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOURSELF. THIS IS
VERY IMPORTANT.
REQUIRED READING EXERCISE [RRE]: WOMEN'S ORGANIZING AND
PUBLIC POLICY
L. Pauline Rankin and Jill Vickers. Women's Movements
and State Feminism: Integrating Diversity into Public Policy.
Status of Women Canada, May 2001.
1. This text is interested in the relationship among public
policy, state feminism and women's movements. Explain the
concept of 'state feminism' and 'femocrat'. Describe the conclusions
Rankin and Vickers draw about this relationship.
Are you persuaded by their presentation? What, if any, questions
remain for you about the viability of state feminism as a
vehicle for making public policy responsive to women's concerns?
2. This text raises the issue of diversity-sensitive public
policy. What does 'diversity-sensitive public policy' mean?
What have you learned about the process necessary to
achieve such policy? Be specific about insights garnered from
the text.
3. With reference to Roberta Hamilton, "The Canadian
State: Feminist Perspectives" (kit), explain what conception
of the state and government informs this text by Rankin and
Vickers. On what grounds might Hamilton challenge Rankin and
Vickers?
4. The authors suggest that globalization is having conflicting
impacts on women, on public policy responsive to women's concerns
and on women's ability to organize to effect responsive public
policy. Describe the problems caused by globalization in these
areas, and the possibilities opened up by processes of globalization.
5. Prepare one question you would like the class to discuss:
a level 3, level 4 and/or 'experiental/point of view' question
(see Guide to Writing Questions below).
Length: 2-3 pages TYPED, DOUBLE SPACED
HAND IN THE ORIGINAL AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOURSELF. THIS IS
VERY IMPORTANT.
REQUIRED READING EXERCISE [RRE]:PEACE ORGANIZING THROUGH
COALITIONS
Cynthia Cockburn The Space Between Us
The class will be divided into three groups, each reading
the chapters about ONE of the conflict sites. Everyone should
read the handout on the "Bat Shalom Address to the UN".
GROUP ONE: IRELAND
Read Introduction, Chapter One, Two, Three and Eight
GROUP TWO: ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Read Introduction, Chapter One, Four, Five and Eight
GROUP THREE: BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA
Read Introduction, Chapter One, Six, Seven and Eight
*Note: chapter one is the most difficult to read. Don't get
stopped by it. Skip what you don't fully understand and re-read
it after you have finished the other chapters.
1. Explain briefly the on-going conflict in the country you
read about. What are the key ingredients that make the situation
difficult to resolve?
These will be shared with students who were reading about
a different conflict.
2. Explain how 'women' and issues of gender are relevant
in the conflict you read about. Is there anything that is
at stake for women specifically in this conflict?
3. Despite the terrible difficulties, women's organizing
in these three countries has been remarkably successful. They
have managed to develop alliances which work across differences.
For the country you read about, explain how they did this.
4. Cockburn works extensively with concepts of identity.
She distinguishes between collective identities, individual
identities, identity hurt, identity processes, and coerced
identities. In your own words, explain each of these concepts.
5. What have you learned from this book that is relevant
to your personal/political/intellectual life?
LENGTH: 2-3 PAGES TYPED DOUBLE SPACED
PLEASE HAND IN THE ORIGINAL AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOURSELF.
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT.
APPENDIX
READING AND PREPARING
This assignment emphasizes the difference between reading
and preparing texts. Students often read a course text from
beginning to end in order to prepare for class. Much to their
dismay, they probably forget much of what they have read.
An `active' approach to preparing a text is necessary. This
means seeking out its internal logic, identifying its strengths
and weaknesses, and a developing a critical perspective on
it. This assignment will develop these skills which are critical
to university success.
Being an active reader not only improves your reading skills
but also your preparedness for class discussion. In general,
the more work students have done on the material outside of
class, the more confident they are to share their thoughts
and ask questions during the discussion. All research shows
that students learn to clarify their thinking and develop
a fluency with the material by participating in such discussions.
Preparing the reading exercises should help you participate
in class and facilitate your learning from other people's
ideas.
READING THE TEXT: MAKING NOTES, HIGHLIGHTING, AND SUMMARIZING
As you proceed through a reading, you may have developed
strategies to identify, mark, and summarize information you
find important. The most popular way is to highlight the text
or underline passages. In general, the process of marking
the text is an important one.
However, some students highlight too much and too quickly.
As soon as they notice something important, they will begin
marking. Students may not have actually read and processed
the material but they assume, that once marked, they will
return to it later. Going back often doesn't happen because
the volume of highlighted material overwhelms students.
A few suggestions can improve your marking strategies.
1. Start by reading the introductory and concluding paragraphs.
This will prepare you for reading the more detailed argument
and help you to understand the author's purpose.
2. Read an entire section between headings before highlighting.
In this way, you can see the development of the whole idea.
You will probably find a concise re-statement of the author's
argument toward the end which will be especially helpful in
writing an annotation.
3. Instead of underlining or highlighting across the page,
make a vertical mark in the margin the length of the number
of lines you want to note. This prevents interruption of your
reading/thinking while still allowing you to identify that
section for later consideration.
4. Circle any concepts you come across.
5. Use a question mark to identify any material you don't
understand. Don't be stopped by your confusion. Often material
at a later point will clarify.
Also when students have difficulties with a reading, they
often think the problem is because they are not able to understand
it. Sometimes the problem is a lack of clarity or a confusion
in the text itself. Learning to identify such weaknesses is
a key part of being a successful university scholar.
6. Use a * to mark points that provoked, challenged and/or
intrigued you.
7. Using you own words in the margin to explain briefly an
idea or note its importance is more effective than using the
words of the author. Rephrasing ideas into your own words
forces you to think the idea through and process its meaning.
ASKING QUESTIONS
An active text reading approach depends upon the ability
to ask questions. Students often think that their role is
to answer questions and that the role of teachers is to ask
questions. This is not true. The effective student is able
to ask questions -- not only of the teacher but also of the
text (any written material). She learns to act like a teacher,
has inside her head a voice asking questions.
Why is asking questions an important skill? The ability to
ask questions is a test of your understanding of the material
since it depends upon careful reading and comprehension. If
the question is in relation to a lecture, it depends upon
careful listening. Asking questions depends upon your ability
to pick out the most important ideas, to focus on the construction
of the argument, to identify potentially weak links in the
evidence, and to make associations with other knowledge that
you have already acquired, i.e., to make comparisons between
texts.
Out of this question-asking process, you will develop your
own point of view on the material -- the key to being a good
scholar and certainly a successful student.
There are different kinds/levels of questions, each of which
involves different skills.
Level One: Level one questioning involves recognition
and recall. This means being able to locate and reproduce
pieces of factual information. In general, level one questions
ask, "What did the author say?" For example, `What
three currents of feminism are described in Chapter One of
Feminist Organizing For Change?' Usually there is only
one right answer to this level of question.
Level Two: Level two questions require a greater contribution
on the part of the learner than merely locating or recognizing
directly stated information. Level two questions ask, "What
did the author mean?" The reader must be able to comprehend
and interpret the material, not just recall it. Level two
questions ask you to identify and explain concepts, and the
logic of arguments. For example, `Explain the difference between
grassroots and institutionalized feminism.' Or `How does Feminist
Organizing For Change explain women's reluctance to identify
as feminists?'
Level Three: Level three questions involve the learner
in analyzing facts and inferences. This type of critical comprehension
requires the reader to apply, analyze, and synthesize material.
It may involve evaluation of the material as well as the integration
of material from several sources. For example, `Feminist
Organizing for Change argues in favour of a socialist
feminist approach. Are you persuaded? Why or why not?' Or
'How would you describe the feminist approach of the Ontario
Coalition for Abortion Clinics? Explain and justify your assessment.'
Level Four: Level four questions ask the learner to utilize
new information in original ways. This level of understanding
requires the greatest contribution on the part of the learner.
Questions of this kind could be called `creative comprehension
questions' or `complex problem solving.' For example, 'Feminist
Organizing for Change suggests that certain historical,
contextual and demographic factors provided the impetus for
the second wave of the women's movement. What factors are
impacting on the shape of the women's movement today?' Or
'What lessons from the second wave of the women's movement
might be helpful to the women's movement today?'
Questions can also solicit points of view and emotional
responses
Some questions are less analytical or text-based in their
focus. They may draw on personal experience and attitudes.
These questions ask learners whether the arguments and presentation
in the texts are consistent with their own experience and
whether the readings have expanded or shifted their understanding
of that experience.
Other questions may ask about emotional responses to material:
discomfort, anger, excitement, resistance, denial, enthusiasm
etc.
|