Mapping the Social Marketing Environment
In the part of the Social
Marketing Plan that deals with the scan of the environment,
"the key demographic, economic, physical, technological,
political/legal, and socio-cultural environmental forces that
affect the social product are assessed. The scan's function is
strategic selectivity, rather than comprehensiveness; that is,
the identification of one or two critical environmental forces
that affect the social product's marketing." (Kotler and
Roberto p. 277) |
Change
6 External Forces That Cause It |
|
Why
We Need To Know About It |
|
What
We Need To Know About it |
|
Issues
in Mapping
Change |
Demographic
Economic
Physical
Technological
Political/Legal
Socio-Cultural |
|
To predict it
To adapt to it |
|
Sources of it
Underlying Causes of it
|
|
Extent of
Controllability
Probability of Occurrence
Locus, Magnitude &
Intensity of Impact
Priority |
6 External Forces That Cause It (example from a city drug
rehabilitation programme)
Demographics |
How old is the average addict? |
Economic |
What city budget is currently
allocated? |
Physical |
How do high stress and pollution
contribute to drug use? |
Technological |
What addiction therapies
exist? |
Political/Legal |
What laws are currently in place? |
Socio-Cultural |
What values and attitudes do
citizens of the city hold about drugs? |
Alternative
Planning Approaches
Probability
of Future Occurrence
Extent of Controllability
Certain
Uncertain
Controllable
|
Commitment
Planning
|
Contingency
Planning
|
Uncontrollable
|
Contingency
Planning
|
Responsive
Planning
|
Four
Classes of Change
|
Type
and
Planning Horizon |
Examples
at
|
Examples
for your Social Product
|
Turbulent |
fast &
vast
1-2 year horizon |
|
|
Unstable |
fast but small
2-3 year horizon |
|
|
Transitional |
slow but vast
3-5 year horizon |
|
|
Stable |
stable
5-20 year horizon |
|
|
Magnitude
of Change
Speed of Change
Large
Small
Slow
|
Transitional
Change
|
Stable
Change
|
Fast
|
Turbulent
Change
|
Unstable
Change
|
|
Exercise
Classes of Change |
What
changes do you expect will affect York
as an educational institution, in each of these
categories?
What
changes do you expect will happen that will affect your
social product? How will you address them? |
|
How
To Map Change |
|
How
to Analyze Change |
Opinion Leader Surveys
Media Content Analysis
Public Opinion Surveys
Analysis of Legislative
Trends |
|
Scenarios
Construction
SWOT Analysis
Issue Identification and
Analysis |
Scenarios Construction
What may happen in the future and what is the likelihood of
it’s happening?
SWOT Analysis – traditional business method
Issue Identification and Analysis Method
An issue is an “unsettled matter
which is ready for decision,” a “debatable point affecting a
social marketing programme that has identifiable influence
groups for and against it” |
For each
environment, identify significant trends, major issues, and who is for
or against:
Demographic, Economic, Physical, Technological, Political/Legal,
Socio/Cultural
Analyzing the Behaviour of Target Adopters
From Your Text
Belief |
"I believe
smoking is hazardous to my health." |
Attitude |
"I believe smoking is hazardous to my health and I
would like to quit smoking." |
Value |
"I believe
smoking is hazardous to everyone's health and all smokers
ought to quit smoking." |
|
The role of the social marketer is to move the
target adopter from holding no belief about the issue to holding a
belief, then to having an attitude toward it, and finally to
internalizing it as a value.
Adoption
Processes
(you may recognize the hierarchies from
Introductory Marketing, and if you've taken it, Consumer
Behaviour)
Hierarchy |
Conditions |
Example |
Recommended
Action |
Learn-Feel-Do |
High
involvement
Clear differences between alternatives |
Living
a more productive lifestyle
|
Encourage
Word-of-Mouth communication |
Do-Feel-Learn |
High
involvement
Few differences between alternatives
Cognitive Dissonance
Attribution Theory |
Using
condom |
Find out what gets to people
most and use that in your communications |
Learn-Do-Feel |
Low
involvement
Few differences between alternatives |
Malnutrition |
Repeat the message to
get people to try it |
Four Adoption Processes
Perceived
Differences Among Alternatives
Involvement
Low
High
High
|
1.
Do-Feel-Learn
|
2.
Learn-Feel-Do
|
Low
|
3.
Learn-Do-Feel
|
|
4.
Multi-Path Adoption – following more than one of these
three
|
Exercise
Learning Hierarchy |
Which
learning hierarchy do you expect your target adopters to
follow? Why? |
|
Learn |
|
|
Sources of Learning
Personal |
Non-personal |
The
adoption experience itself |
|
Timing of Learning
Time different information flows at different stages
depending on learning process target adopters
follow |
How
Target Adopter Evaluates Learning
What is the
potential set of attributes? |
Which subset
of those attributes will your target
adopter consider? |
What is the
adopter's subjective judgment regarding
those attributes? |
What
different weights will the target adopter
place on the attributes?
|
How will the
adopter process evaluation criteria? |
|
Motivating
Adopters to Learn
Use vivid
examples and make it come close to home
Consider type and amount of information provided;
differentiate social product just like a
traditional one |
Do |
|
|
Determinants
of Trial Adoption
The Need to Manage a
Risk or Low Involvement
Perceived Risks of Adoption
Social
Risk - Is this socially
acceptable to people whose opinions I care
about? |
Psychological
Risk - Will this yield its
promised result? |
Physical
Risk - Does this have any side
effects? Can it be harmful to me?
|
Functional
Risk - Will it actually do what
it says it will do? Will it work? |
Financial
Risk - Will it be worth the
money I spend? |
|
Determinants
of Committed Adoption
Adopters believe in and
like the product after a positive experience in
the trial adoption where they found performance
equal to their expectations, and preferably better
|
Analyzing the Diffusion of Social Products
Predicting and Explaining Social
Diffusion and Change
Spread of Adoption |
Expectation |
Cause |
Rapid
Penetration |
Penetration of
small portion of target population |
Diffusion is
fast if target adopters are highly predisposed and social
product has simplicity, communicability, relative
advantage, compatibility, and divisibility |
Gradual
Penetration |
Will reach from early
adopters to laggards |
There are
different target adopter segments |
Contagion |
Will reach the
whole population |
|
Social Change Theory
Influences on Selective Acceptance
Adopter's attitudes
and values |
Compatibility with
culture |
Demonstrability
|
Costs |
|
|
Change agent or
campaign itself |
|
Managing Social Diffusion
Achieving Rapid Takeoff
Focus on market
segments predisposed to product |
Focus on innovators
and early adopters |
Aim for simplicity,
communicability, relative advantage,
compatibility, divisibility |
Make the product
accessible through aggressive outlets |
Achieving Rapid Acceleration
Greater social
interaction |
Greater exposure |
Manageability of
technical difficulties & costs |
Frequency of
promotion by public figures |
Achieving Rapid Penetration
Price or cost |
Multiple uses or
consistent users |
|
Exercise
Charts and Tables |
We
will work in class in groups on these issues for your social marketing projects |
|
Topic |
Page
(Kotler/Roberto) |
Class of Change You
Expect |
84-85 |
Analysis of
Environmental Data |
88-90 |
Issue Identification
and Analysis |
89 (Table 4-5) |
Decision on Learning Quadrant |
95 (Figure 5-3) |
Analysis of Learning,
Feeling, Doing |
99-107 |
List of Risks |
107 |
Expected Spread of
Adoption |
120-123 |
Diffusion of
Innovation |
126 (Table 6-1) |
Influences on
Selective Acceptance |
129-130 |
|