SOSC 4319 |
|
Examining Adaptation in The Sweet Hereafter: Atom Egoyan's Film
According to Andrew Dudley's adaptation theories, Atom Egoyan's film The Sweet Hereafter is a "transformation" of Bank's novel -- as a whole, the film remains faithful to the spirit and story of the original. Egoyan's version preserves the "kernels," or core, of the novel but takes on a new discourse of supplementary "satellites" in order to depict the story visually and expand upon the concepts of Banks' version. Egoyan tackles the challenge of adapting the five person point of view of the novel by choosing Mitchell Stephens, the lawyer, as his central character. In Banks' novel, Stephens is the farthest removed from the events as he is the one narrator from outside the town of Sam Dent; however, Egoyan puts him right in the middle of the action. Egoyan is still able to tell the characters' individual stories as Stephens travels around to interview and propose a lawsuit to the townspeople. Furthermore, seeing Stephens outside the context of the accident (he is shown two years later on a plane talking to a woman who had known his daughter) allows Stephens' own narrative to be told, giving a more in-depth look at his life and intentions for pursuing the lawsuit. We find out that Stephens feels he has lost his own daughter to drugs and AIDs and is able to relate to the suffering of the members of the town. Egoyan intermixes three periods of time throughout the movie (before the accident in the town, right afterwards in the town, and Stephens on the airplane two years later). Using this dynamic fabula, or order of events, he is consequently able to give an intricate view of how the townspeople are connected, or separated, as well as how Mitchell Stephens fits into the whole picture.
|
||||
|