Examining Adaptation in The
Sweet Hereafter: Narrative Theory
There are a wide variety of theories that seek to examine narrative
structure and seek to explain the way stories can be told and
broken down. Some theorists, such as Seymour
Chatman in his book Story and Discourse,
argue that stories inherently contain elements that are crucial
to their narrative structure (which he calls kernels) as well
as elements that can easily be removed without hurting the finished
product (called satellites). He explains that the minor satellites
embellish and enhance the major kernels, which are so important
because they determine the way in which the plot advances (53-54).
When applied to film adaptation,
this would imply that the essential kernels must be preserved
in order for a text to be adapted to film despite the different
levels of fidelity, which may be
pursued by a filmmaker.
Mieke Bal's Narratology:
Introduction to the Theory of Narrative also analyzes
different aspects of narrative, focusing specifically on the sequence
of events and how they are presented in any particular story.
Bal suggests that there are three layers to any narrative: stories
(sequences of events), texts (versions of the stories), and fabula
(the chronological way in which things are presented) (5). This
idea is similar to Chatman's kernels and satellites because it
examines the roles of the central story and the supporting details
which make up a particular version of a story, yet Bal's concept
of fabula is unique because it favors the importance of chronology
in telling a story. The order in which events are told become
quite important when a filmmaker adapts a narrative text because
the actual chronological order of events in a story may not coincide
with the order in which they are told in a text or shown in a
film, as demonstrated in both Russell Banks' novel
The Sweet Hereafter and Adom Egoyan's film
adaptation of the same title.